|
| Age
of enlightenment |
| The
Times, Nov 30, 2002, Copyright (C) The Times, 2002 |
On with the neuro-linguistic programming. This week: revenge fantasies. I told
Sue Beer, my NLP therapist, that I often find myself, for no reason, hating
somebody I haven't seen for years. People tell me I've got to move on, but the
hating and the thirst for vengeance come unbidden, unwilled, uncontrolled. Sue
said she could help, and off we went. It got a bit weird, but then, we can all
agree, life is weird, isn't it?
Sue suggested that it is only a part of me that has these fantasies, that they
are not representative of me as a total adult. I agreed. She said that the part
of me that runs the revenge fantasies was formed at a much earlier age in
response to a set of difficult circumstances with which, given the limited
repertoire of youth, I could not otherwise deal. "The point is," she said, "the
Part will once have had some positive function. Until we negotiate some
alternative behaviour, it will keep going in the same way."
I think she is right. My revenge fantasies, so fresh and exciting when first
formed in my teens, now seem stale and stuck. I imagine that those habituated
to pulp fiction, or junk food, or pornography, or other juvenile tastes, might
feel the same way. "As far as the Part knows," Sue emphasised, "it has been
sticking up for you and getting no thanks. Unless it believes we understand it,
it won't play. It sounds weird saying, 'Oooo, thank you' to your Part, but
that's how it works."
Sue told me to close my eyes and begin to welcome the Part. Instantly, I saw
an elderly man coming up some steps, a sort of faithful old retainer emerging
blinking into the light after years of solitary, subterranean living. He stood
there, head bowed, silent. "Is the Part willing to communicate?" asked Sue. He
seems submissive, I said. I realised that the Part was a film projectionist.
Down in his cellar-cinema, in response to my command, it was his job to put the
old revenge fantasy reels up on the screen.
"Ask the Part," said Sue, "if it's willing to let me know what it's been
trying to do for you all this time." The projectionist looked at the ground,
wringing his hands. He's been doing his duty, I told Sue: what he was told to
do 25 years ago when he first came to work here. "Does the Part know the
purpose of what it does?" asked Sue. The old servant continued to stare mutely
at the ground. No, he doesn't know, I told Sue. It's blind obedience. "Has he
forgotten?" This time, the projectionist managed a small, embarrassed nod.
Yeah, I said, he's forgotten. "Thank the Part for communicating," said Sue,
"and I'd like to thank the Part as well." Er, thank you, Part, I said -though
not out loud. The projectionist bobbed his head.
"Am I right in thinking," Sue went on, "that you've got a creative part in
there as well? A part that comes up with ideas?" Immediately, a man who looked
like me drifted into my mind. He -I -was wearing, to my surprise and shame, a
tight black polo-neck jumper -not a garment I have ever, obviously, had any
truck with in real life. "I want the revenge fantasy Part to go to the creative
Part," said Sue, "and explain the current situation. I want him to ask the
Creative Part to come up with new ideas: suitable substitutes that will
satisfy, if it still exists, his original purpose."
There followed a very long silence. I tried to conjure up a conversation
between a tight-lipped superannuated presumably psychotic cellar-dwelling
slasher-movie projectionist and a smooth polo-necked Channel 4 executive type I
instinctively disliked. It wasn't easy. But after a while, and for the first
time in my life, I understood what novelists mean when they say their
characters start to take on lives of their own. Against all odds, the two parts
got on well. The creative -never judge a book by its cover - turned out to be
an all right kind of guy. He offered the projectionist a new job helping to
make other sorts of films.
The projectionist was thrilled. A revelation! I told Sue that he had a
particular hankering for comedy. He wants to make funny films, I said. "Sounds
good," she said, and asked me to check that the projectionist was willing to
take responsibility for this new approach for a trial period of one month. He's
raring to go, I assured her. "Can you now ask," she said, "if there are any
other Parts who have any objections to these negotiations taking place?"
Several angry men stomped in. "We're the Violence Department," they said, "and
we're not happy." I said, come on chaps, it's not as if you get anything out of
the status quo. I might have lots of violent thoughts, but we don't actually go
around being violent, do we? They grunted, unsure. So I promised them that if
this new, comic response to the memory of my enemies works, I will get my
punchbag out, hang it up again like the old days, and make time for some
genuine violence. That did the trick.
I reported all this to Sue. "Can you just check that the Violence Department
are OK to observe the new behaviour over the next month?" she asked. Yeah, it's
fine, I said, the Violence Department are cool with the month's trial. So:
we're all of us good to go. Let's see what happens.
|
|